{"id":33144,"date":"2019-11-01T19:58:41","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T23:58:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/reviewofmm.com\/?p=33144"},"modified":"2020-09-18T09:10:20","modified_gmt":"2020-09-18T13:10:20","slug":"why-binocular-vision-matters-in-myopia-management","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reviewofmm.com\/why-binocular-vision-matters-in-myopia-management\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Binocular Vision Matters in Myopia Management"},"content":{"rendered":"
November 1, 2019<\/strong><\/p>\n By Daniel Tilia, BOptom (Hons), MOptom, GradCertOcTher, FBCLA, FAA<\/strong><\/p>\n Optometry plays an important role in both diagnosing and managing binocular vision disorders. Binocular vision disorders have been associated with increased near-work symptoms1<\/sup> and reduced academic achievement,2<\/sup> while successful treatment of a binocular vision disorder has been associated with reduced adverse academic behaviors and reduced parental concern regarding academic achievement.3<\/sup> A binocular vision assessment is, therefore, an important component of a routine optometric consultation.<\/p>\n In addition to the above considerations, practitioners offering myopia management need to know the effect a patient\u2019s binocular vision status has on their management strategies. Even though it is debatable, several binocular vision functions have been associated with myopia progression. The various myopia-management strategies may also affect binocular vision, which may or may not be beneficial depending on the patient\u2019s binocular vision status. For example, center-distance multifocal soft contact lenses increase near exophoria and provide near plus.4<\/sup> This may be beneficial for eso-related or accommodative insufficiency-related disorders, but it is less beneficial for exo-related or accommodative excess-related disorders. It is, therefore, incumbent on the practitioner performing myopia management to be aware of a patient\u2019s binocular vision status and manage a patient\u2019s binocular vision disorder. Management of a binocular vision disorder may involve choosing myopia management strategies that are beneficial to a patient\u2019s binocular vision status, performing vision therapy, or referring to another practitioner specializing in vision therapy.<\/p>\n The International Myopia Institute5<\/sup> (IMI) recommends the following tests be performed at a baseline examination and at follow-up visits to monitor changes with myopia management strategies:<\/p>\n The IMI also lists various clinical methods that can be used to measure these outcomes.5<\/sup><\/p>\n In addition to these tests, the practitioner may also consider tests at baseline that aid in the differential diagnosis of a binocular vision disorder. These include monocular accommodative facility, near point of convergence, negative and positive fusional reserves at distance and near and negative and positive relative accommodation (B+ and B-, respectively) at near.6<\/sup><\/p>\n Much of the interest in binocular vision and myopia management stems from differences in myopes compared to non-myopes for various aspects of binocular function, particularly accommodative function. These differences appear to be associated with a need for myopes to increase accommodative effort at near, characterised by a higher lag of accommodation7<\/sup> and lower amplitude of accommodation.8<\/sup> This has a direct effect on other aspects of accommodative function, including reduced B-9, 10<\/sup> and accommodative facility,8, 11<\/sup> and an indirect effect on vergence function, including increased esophoria10<\/sup> and higher AC\/A ratio.8, 12<\/sup><\/p>\n Even though several studies have found an association between lag of accommodation,8, 13, 14<\/sup> AC\/A ratio14, 15<\/sup> and accommodative facility8<\/sup> with myopia progression, other studies have not found an association for any of these binocular vision functions.11, 12, 14, 16, 17<\/sup> The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) study found an association between lag of accommodation and AC\/A ratio with myopia progression in younger children but not older children in the univariate analysis, but significance was lost in the multivariate analysis.18<\/sup> Another study found a significant correlation between AC\/A ratio and myopia progression in a single-factor analysis, but not in a multifactorial model.8<\/sup><\/p>\n Esophoria has not been associated with myopia progression in spectacle lens studies employing progressive addition19<\/sup> or executive bifocal20<\/sup> lenses when all subjects used the same near add power. One study reported good myopia management efficacy with ACUVUE\u00ae Bifocal (Johnson & Johnson, USA) contact lenses.21<\/sup> Near add power was increased until the associated near esophoria was neutralized, but the exact mechanism for efficacy is unknown.21<\/sup><\/p>\n In terms of myopia management, these findings are of little consequence as the primary objective is to minimize myopia progression. However, strategies used in myopia management can affect binocular vision function. The most obvious is the muscarinic agonist atropine.22<\/sup> Atropine causes a dose-dependent reduction of the amplitude of accommodation,23-25<\/sup> leading to reduced accommodative function and tendency towards esophoria.<\/p>\n The effect of spectacle lenses used for myopia management is also well-known. Near plus reduces near accommodative response resulting in an exophoric shift dependent on the near add power and the AC\/A ratio. Near plus also reduces near hyperopic blur caused by a high lag of accommodation. Bifocal lenses are expected to have a greater effect at similar add power compared to progressive addition lenses, as the maximum near power is more easily accessible. Executive bifocal lenses with base-in prism reduce the near exophoria induced by near plus power, which may be beneficial in children with a low lag of accommodation.20<\/sup><\/p>\n The effect on binocular vision function of contact lenses used in myopia management depends on lens design. Center-distance multifocals act similarly to spectacle near plus in that they reduce near accommodative response26, 27<\/sup> and increase near exophoria.4, 26<\/sup> Center-distance contact lenses do not appear to affect amplitude of accommodation,4<\/sup> while the effect on accommodative facility is debateable.4,28<\/sup><\/p>\n There are no published results for binocular vision status while wearing MiSight\u00ae (CooperVision, USA) contact lenses. One study assessed differences in binocular vision function while wearing best-corrected subjective refraction in a trial frame between two groups habitually wearing either MiSight or single vision contact lenses.29<\/sup> There were no differences between groups for distance and near phorias, calculated AC\/A ratio, amplitude of accommodation or accommodative response.29<\/sup><\/p>\n There are also no published results for binocular vision status while wearing MYLO\u00ae (mark\u2019ennovy, Spain) contact lenses. One study assessed within-group differences in binocular vision function between a lens of similar design to MYLO (i.e.,<\/em> extended depth of focus [EDOF] designed via deliberate manipulation of multiple modes of spherical aberration terms) and a single vision contact lens.30<\/sup> There were no significant differences between lens designs for distance and near phoria and accommodative facility, while EDOF lenses provided less central hyperopic defocus.30<\/sup><\/p>\n Orthokeratology induces more exophoria and less lag of accommodation compared to soft, single vision contact lenses.31<\/sup><\/p>\n In summary, treating a binocular vision disorder has benefits that may not extend to myopia management. Practitioners performing myopia management should be aware of their patient\u2019s binocular vision status before commencing treatment. Practitioners should also be willing to manage binocular vision disorders, especially when myopia management strategies exacerbate a pre-existing binocular vision disorder.<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Daniel Tilia, BOptom (Hons), MOptom, GradCertOcTher, FBCLA, FAAO <\/strong>is a PhD candidate at the Brien Holden Vision Institute.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Practitioners offering myopia management need to know the effect a patient\u2019s binocular vision status has on their management strategies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":255,"featured_media":33153,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1355],"tags":[1844,1258,522,1232,1565,1841,460,1524,1843,1775,41,1390,1845,1394,1842],"yoast_head":"\n\n
References<\/span><\/h1>\n
\n